Listening to Patients. A Study of Illness Discourses, Patient Identities, and User Involvement in Contemporary Psychiatric Practice
Avhandlingen er skrevet på engelsk, men med et sammendrag også på dansk.
På baggrund af
analyserne
argumenteres der
for,
at for
at
kunne
praktisere
en mere demokratisk grad af brugerinddragelse,
er de professionelle
nødt til
at blive støttet
af et system der er mere åbent for multiple definitioner af psykisk lidelse og patienthed,
i deres forsøg på at involvere patienternes perspektiver.
Ligeledes
peges der på vigtigheden
af
at involvere
brugerne
af det psykiatriske system i
langt højere grad
til
at udvikle modeller for brugerinddragelse.
Dette kan
åbne op for,
at
mangfoldigheden
og diversiteten i
patienternes perspektiver tages alvorligt, også når
disse
adskiller sig betydeligt
fra traditionelle psykiatriske forståelser.
Viser innlegg med etiketten Språk. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Språk. Vis alle innlegg
9.1.14
3.8.13
Om sosial konstruksjon av psykisk lidelse
Fra sammendraget til den australske studien “You can’t put it in a box and tie it with a ribbon”: The consumer movement and the social construction of mental illness, som foreligger i fulltekst:
First, the social construction of mental illness is drawn up by two principle discourses: professionals pathologize mental illness and consumers contextualize mental illness... Second, analysis of the social practices of mental health care settings as revealed in language foregrounded central concerns around administration. Mental health care as an institution has produced what Foucault (1978) names “procedural techniques” for recording information. These are techniques of control that prescribe the rules of conduct for professionals and consumers in the institution of mental health care. These techniques reduce the agency and personal responsibility of professionals and marginalize the self-knowledge of consumers.
First, the social construction of mental illness is drawn up by two principle discourses: professionals pathologize mental illness and consumers contextualize mental illness... Second, analysis of the social practices of mental health care settings as revealed in language foregrounded central concerns around administration. Mental health care as an institution has produced what Foucault (1978) names “procedural techniques” for recording information. These are techniques of control that prescribe the rules of conduct for professionals and consumers in the institution of mental health care. These techniques reduce the agency and personal responsibility of professionals and marginalize the self-knowledge of consumers.
8.3.12
Fra "psykisk sykdom" til "hjernesykdom"?
Debate on whether the term "mental health" is misleading will take place at the 20th European Congress of Psychiatry. Dr Baker will present the pros for changing the designation from mental illness to brain illness.
Abonner på:
Innlegg (Atom)